Digital XLR vs. Analog XLR - Balanced Cables

I don't see reason why any company would use oversized foamed teflon tubes and 99.9999999% pure copper in digital cable but if you say they do - I trust you.

Ckoffend - Purcell, being upsampling DAC (and not oversampling), most likely rejects jitter. Quality and type of cable might be not very important (it isn't with my Benchmark - also upsampling DAC).

The temporary cables that I have tried, to confirm that I am getting the full 24/192 upsampling sound very good. As I previously mentioned, to upconvert to this level, it is required that I used two balanced digital cables to handle the full bandwidth. DCS indicates that it is impossible to transmit this amount of bandwidth on either a Coax digital cable, a glass optical digital cable or a single balanced AES/EBU cable. I don't necessarily question this, but before spending a several hundred dollars per cable, I wanted to be sure that the two appropriate cables would actually deliver the required upsamping level I wanted to hear/test. Since I have plenty of balanced analog cables, I was just seeking a reasonable and fast opportunity to test.

I don't know why DCS want to transfer signal on two cables (Benchmark uses one for 24bit/192kHz) but jitter rejection properties might make cable discussion irrelevant.

Ckoffend-

You can try them; they should work. You have nothing to lose.

OTOH, I would be more certain that digital cables would work for analog.

Kal