Is DEQX a game changer?

Sorry Bombaywalla, I still think some time coherent speakers look like insects or Dr. Who Dileks.

I did audition another unnamed "Brand X" 1st order speaker about 2 years ago and my reaction was surprise and disappointment. It was just plain ugly.

Hey man, at least I'm coming over to your side of the street. I bought a DEQX and effected time coherence improvements. And, my speakers don't look like insects.

LOL

09-29-14: Bifwynne
Sorry Bombaywalla, I still think some time coherent speakers look like insects or Dr. Who Dileks.

LOL, Bruce. In my post I NEVER referred to the looks of the speakers - I was trying to stay technical & to the point - but for some reason you like to bring up this topic every time you can - it seems to give you pleasure, no? ;-)

I did audition another unnamed "Brand X" 1st order speaker about 2 years ago and my reaction was surprise and disappointment. It was just plain ugly.

sorry to read this - not every speaker designer knows how to design a good 1st order time-coherent speaker. From your text, tho', it looks like you were pre-dispositioned to dislike them; their looks seemed to have over-taken your better judgement......

Hey man, at least I'm coming over to your side of the street. I bought a DEQX and effected time coherence improvements.

yup! And, I'm happy to see that esp. since you've realized what time coherence is all about & how it positively affects the music playback. It didn't take too long for you to convert once we had all that discussion in the Sloped Baffle thread! :-) You're a quick learner, I say.

And, my speakers don't look like insects.

....but they look like coffins where you can bury your previous time-INcoherent music playback.... ;-)

Bif, when I compared the DEQX DAC to the Chord 64 I was previously using, it was more lively sounding and I happily used this as a replacement. I like very precise transient attack, including bass that is clean & deep but starts/stops very fast. Much more realistic to true life and the DEQX DAC has that

The DAC I changed to at the beginning of 2014 was auditioned first and sounded just as lively but somehow has almost the same analogue 'smoothness' as vinyl (input via the HDP3 balanced XLR input). It gives me exactly what I was looking for

I did a back-to-back comparison yesterday to check again before posting and the DEQX DAC still sounds slightly more artificial and brittle at the extreme top end, a bit more 'Hi-Fi' than natural to my ears

Drewan77, are you using the Chord in addition to the DEXQ?

Drewan, to eliminate that "slightly more artificial and brittle"
sound it the top end- I suggest experimenting with ac isolation and conditioning devices for your unit and source, and some high quality power cords. Good luck. I agree it's difficult to acknowledge our old(er) treasures have been surpassed in ways that surprise us. (I think improved power supply management is often one of the big factors.)