Love of MUSIC or love of GEAR


I think the appeal of audio gear is more complicated than simply a love of music. In my experience I have not seen much of a correlation between the love of music and the pursuit of high-end gear. That is not to say that audiophiles do not necessarily love music – I think that they do (or they at least have some kind of aural fetish)– or the gear would not make sense to them. But if the full appreciation of music was dependant on hearing it played through the best gear, then musicians, composers, CBC FM radio hosts (yes, I am Canadian) – would all be audiophiles. As it stands, this is not the rule but the exception. (I would bet that there are more architects than musicians that have high-end systems.) I propose that the pursuit of high-end audio has something to do with an obsession with the POTENTIAL of gear to produce music. Wrapped up in this ‘potential’ are the aesthetics and physical appearance of the gear, its smell, feel, ergonomics, size and mass, technological innovation, myths associated with it, etc. The pursuit of gear in this context is its potential to offer a doorway to a world of music as expansive and rich as we can imagine, that we can open at will - by ourselves or with others who are willing to listen.
neubilder
Neubuilder: I agree with the last half of your post. Full appreciation of music, like literature, depends on many things. There is an intellectual aspect, such as history and biography, that is helped with education (not necessarily formal). More importantly, in my mind, is a genuine love for music. Even with those it is difficult to fully appreciate music on a boom box. Can you fully appreciate a novel with every other page or line missing? Sure, you might follow the general storyline and even come away with a fair idea of the author's message. But you would have missed the details that make characters life-like and scenes vivid. Does this mean that people who listen to music on low-fi systems don't love music? No! Perhaps they don't have the means to purchase a better one. Or maybe they spend their money on live performances (something that no system, yet, can match). Why don't more music professionals own high-end systems? Who knows. Perhaps they don't sit and listen to music in their living rooms like much of the public does.
I have been a starving audiophile. When I was 21 I bought my first real hi-fi system. A then ten year old quad 33/303/fm3 system with misson 77's that I paid $425CAN for. Still love the way it looks... and sounds, but I have moved on since then.
Both; When I find a classical recording performance I like better than the one I have I "upgrade". The performance matter most to me. The audiophile interest comes from wanting these recordings to sound as good as possible. I do sometimes have more than one favorite of a particular piece, but an upgrade means the old recording is traded in or sold. I do have musician friends who have nice gear, but I think most would rather spend the money on live performances.
PS: I do sing in a professional chorus, and do go to lots of live concerts, so I guess I fit in the musician group also; just not full time. We/I will be performing with Dave Brubeck in Baltimore in March if anyone is interested.
Interesting thread and posts. And a great comment above-- I've been a "starving audiophile" too-- Mungo Love big amps, heh heh heh.