Best Long-Distance receiving Tuners


Looking for a used Tuner to clearly pull in stations from Los Angeles, I am approx 130 miles south and currently have a MacIntosh 1700 receiver which has a tube tuner. I have a FanFare SC-1 whip antenna which gets the station I want only marginally. I can't put up a roof antenna and I don't want to spend $300 for the Audio Prism 7ft indoor antenna. I am sure the Mac 1700 tuner is not equal in alternate channel selectivity or signal rejection to many tuners made after 1980. Appreciate all opinions and input. Thanks, Jimbo
sunnyjim
The F-93 is a very smooth sounding tuner for a Solid State but I would take the Fanfare over the F-93 for transparency and the Rotel RHT-10 over the Fanfare for transparency and an Aligned with NOS Telefunkens in McIntosh MR-67, MR-71,Fisher 200B, Marantz 10B, or Citation IIIx over all of the Solid States for "You are there sound!".

By the way, and this is very serious....for our nation, Michael Powell (Collen's son and FCC head) wants to increase the concentration of voices in one or two corporate mega giants by allowing them to own all the newspapers, radio stations, TV Stations, etc in several markets. If you think 911 blind sided us this is a most major ENRON type curtain there ever could be. Hitler never killed one person in WWII except himself, just his Zombies did. Propaganda did it all. I know this sounds extreme but to those that have traveled extensively in Europe you know what taping our mouths shut can do. There are many venues covering this including www.fair.org (just run search under Michael Powell's name).

1. Good antenna
2. Magnum Dynalab tuner
3. Magnum Dynalab Signal Sleuth tunable RF preamp
Well, sooner or later you have to make a decision for really long distance or for some good sound.
I tried a few. I have a excellent antenna on the roof with a strong rotor.
The best long distance tuner was the Onkyo T-9990. Unbelievable.

But horrible from sound quality. Compressed and dry.

After that I changed to a Dynalab Eutude with a Signal Sleuth 205. I would say, this combo was very close to the Onkyo, but much better sounding.
Now I use a Dynalab 108 with the SS 205. That's it for me.
Long distances are ok, but not on par with the Onkyo, but the sound quality is unbelievable good.
Definetly the best from both worlds.
I had the Onkyo T-9090 (I don't think they ever made a T-9990) and T-9090 II. The F-93 was superior in long distance ability over the Onkyo all over the FM band. Yet the Onkyo was very good indeed for getting stations. I agree the Onkyo sounds terrible. I would say nearly as bad sounding as any tuner I have every had. Too bad you can not use a good tube tuner (not a watered down version in a receiver) since they sound far more realistic than all the solid states I have ever come across. No wonder so many TAS reviewers use them over solid state.
You can have a good tube tuner: the MD108. Oops except it's not all tubes, just the audio output stages I believe. I have the MD102, one step down from the 108, but it's still marvelous.