John Dunlavy On "Cable Nonsense"

Sorry JT, I was tired and did not catch that one in time.... Good one though.

Oh yea, they do the disappering thing when ever you ask for a list of the equipment they use, or have heard. It's a pretty easy qestion.

Of course they will come back to give me another -2,-2... Thanks guy.

It always surprises me to hear someone adamantly denying hearing any sonic differences between the various manufactured interconnects, and all the while condeming others that do. Without sarcasim meant, I honestly wonder if those that argue against these facts are possibly sonically deaf, or maybe it's their gear...I don't know. It truly perplexes me though, that they appear to be sincere audiophiles and do apparently appreciate music, still, they are unable to hear the tone, detail, or soundstage changes in their music, when equipment changes are made, yes even to include interconnects. I know I do, and if you don't, well stay with your Emerson clock radios and stop being a nuisance to others.

I don't think there's anyone here trying to claim that all audio gear is of the same quality, or that no changes made to equipment will have an effect on the sound it produces. That's absurd.
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm just interested in what happens in blind tests, and if anyone remembers, that's what the article that started this thread is about.
The relevance of such tests to your listening is debatable.