Cable vs. Electronics: biggest bang for the buck


I recently chronicled in a review here, my experience with a very expensive interconnect. The cables cost nearly $7000 and are well beyond my reach. The issue is, the Pursit Dominus sound fantastic. Nothing in my stereo has ever sounded so good. I have been wondering during and since the review how much I would have to spend to get the same level of improvement. I'm sure I could double the value of my amp or switch to monoblocks of my own amps and not obtain this level of improvement.
So, in your opinion what is the better value, assuming the relative value of your componants being about equal? Is it cheaper to buy, great cables or great electronics? Then, which would provide the biggest improvement?
128x128nrchy
What thread have you been reading 6chac? There was all kinds of excitement, even though everyone was having fun. I sure did. Differences of opinions don't make anyone wrong. They are just opinions and lots of people got to share their opinion about a broad range of topics from history, philosophy, and cables. That's how it should be!
When I abruptly exited, I forgot to say, "I think I swallowed a bug." Let me correct that omission. I think I swallowed a bug.
I don't know if anyone is still following this, but I bought a new amp. It is not a $7000 amp, but it was too darn close for comfort. After it is broken-in I will have to resolve in my own mind whether the improvement was greater with the Purist Dominus or with the new amp.

Maybe I should give up on all of this a persue the study of philosophy!
Nrchy...are you serious? Just enjoy the music and don't "let yourself be sickenend by the mind's grey thoughts" ..free translation out of Goethe's "Faust", above all: congratulations for getting a new plaything !