interconnect vs speaker cable


Everything being equal, and I use that term loosely, of course; which one, interconnect or cable, gives you the most sound for the dollar? How about this way? Again, things being equal, which would you upgrade first, or better yet, if you could only upgrade one, due to $ (and you couldn't make the other upgrade for a long while), which would it be? I know, I know, there are loads of other factors, but just let's pretend there aren't any, or, again, everything's equal. There's that ubiquitous "equal" again. Thanks in advance.
warren
128x128warrenh
To answer the question directly, everything else being equal, I believe it is much harder to get an adequate speaker cable than it is to get an adequate interconnect. So I would not skimp on the speaker cable, I would skimp on the interconnect. This is just based on experience, no science.
The biggest priority when shopping should be to maximize the quality of the pieces closest to the source. Great speaker cable will not be able to add what your interconnect did not deliver. That is why your source equipment is always more important than your speakers (all things being equal:). See my reviews of Purist ICs if you are interested in more of this type of conversation.
Look at it this way:

1. Everything between source and speaker distorts the signal in some way.
2. No cable can return a distortion to its original state.
3. The closest thing to your source is the first to distort.

Since the speaker cable cannot correct whatever your interconnect flux up, the IC would take priority IMO.

All things being = , of course...
Much as I agree in general with the conclusions of Nrchy and Gs5556 with respect to components, I suggest they actually try combinations of IC and Speaker Cables and see what they experience.

I have certainly found the theory of biasing expenditure towards the source to be very sound, but that the idea does not apply so well to cables.

I do not buy for a minute the mantra of "which comes first, is the most important", and claiming it to have an unassailable logic is simply incorrect.

While you might claim no speaker cable can right the wrongs of the interconnect, it seems equally likely to me that no interconnect can be so good that a poor speaker cable that follows it will sound anything better than a poor speaker cable.

If good means "quality in, quality out", and bad means "quality in, garbage out", then a bad IC followed by good speaker cable results in "quality in, garbage out", and a good IC followed by bad speaker cable also results in "quality in, garbage out". Such simple binary logic fails to lead to any conclusion. Therefore the issue is resolved by examining incremental benefit for incremental dollars spent - the answers for each being a curve not a straight line, meaning the answer may change as the dollars spent goes up.

Therefore logic gets you nowhere, despite the claims in the previous two posts. I suggest some experience of trying different combinations is a good idea in that case.
Thanks for the feedback guys. Interconnect it is. It's ordered already.
warren