Digital Cables

Hello,
Last year I put in an MIT digital cable in place of a cheapo RCA cable I had been using between my Pioneer PD65 and Manley DAC. This was only a home trial from the MIT cable dealer so I had nothing to lose. But I was quite surprised to hear greater distinction between each note in the music with the MIT cable. I have read from the Audiogon forums that smearing is one artifact greatly reduced with digital cable and transport upgrades. The cable change here convinced me of this. I will not even begin to spectulate what happened here but my ears told me it was a definite improvment. After swapping cables a few times, I knew it was for real. Oh well, another $350 spent on a cable but it was well worth the improvement. And it was not subtle.
John

It is true. Cables make a HUGE difference. That's why all the fuss about them, don't you think ? That's why there are hundreds of cable manufacturers out there. Another reason is the big profit of course. But when listening to different cables you will see that each of them has a personal character. Others are neutral, others are not, but could be the one which makes your system sound nicer. I recently replaced my Yamamura 5000 (digital-coaxial) with a very cheap one just for fun. The result was not so bad as I expected but after a while I just couldn't listen to my system. I was bored to death ! (For the history the yamamura 5000 costs about $800/m and the cheap one about $0.5/m )

Just a suggestion, call The Cable Company at 1-800-fatwyre and ask to talk to John. They have a library where you can check out cables and audition them for a week. I had (still have) the MIT Digital Reference that cost $350.00 for eight years. Last summer I started to upgrade, and started with the the DAC and digital cable since computers have progressed so much. I'd always read how good the Kimber D-60 was, so John sent me one and told me that I needed to decide if I wanted to hear music or detail, because there is a difference. He told me that the D-60 at $290.00 was a great detailed cable while the Accoustic Zen MC Squared at $300.00 is a great musical cable, just to name two of many that he has. I really liked the D-60 because I have played music for years and like to hear what each instrument is doing. Right when I was ready to order the D-60. John threw a new cable at me, the Stereovox HDXV for an introductory $75.00 before Jan.1, 2004, and $100.00 afterwards. It is made by the same guy would made the D-60, Chris S., and is even better than the D-60 he made 10 years ago, for only $100.00. Call John, the website is www.fatwyre.com, they carry tons of cables and you can audition them all. Not to knock the MIT Digital Reference, which was the very best I found in my search eight years ago, it's outdated now with the more precise technological studies. I tried to sell it and trade it, and no one was even interested in it. If you want it, send me $20.00 and I'll send it to you. It's a lot better than any stock cable, and for $20.00 you can't lose. Please call John though, the Stereovox HDXV is worth checking out, and for $100.00 you really have nothing to lose. At www.audiopoints.com, they sell Sonoran Plateau cables that are shielded with special microsteel beads. Their digital cable is about $500.00, but it sounds really good too.

Wanted to add something because I just looked at your system. Right before Christmas I traded in my Krell KRC-3 pre-amp and KSA-50S amp for a Musical Fidelity A308cr pre-amp and amp. My speakers are B&W Silver Signatures. I also traded in my Conrad-Johnson D/A-3 DAC on the Musical Fidelity Tri-Vista 21 DAC to use with my Theta Data Basic transport and Stereovox HDXV digital cable. Sound familiar? I then replaced every cable (interconnect, speaker, digital, and power) with the Sonoran Plateau series after auditioning everything I could get my hands on from The Cable Company that cost $75.00 - $1500.00. I went with the Sonoran cables because I heard more music and better detail than I'd ever heard in my life, and I'm 50 years old. The Sonoran Plateau series cables from AudioPoints are only $500.00 a set, so they're really not THAT expensive considering some others out there. I had Synergistic Research power cables (the original ones) and tried the new SR Active one that was the quietest, nicest one I've ever heard. I just went with the Sonoran power cables because they were really good too, and I got a deal buying the whole group together. By the way, where did you get your Theta Data Basic II? It's supposed to be quite a bit better than my Data Basic. Have a good day. Chuck

One more thought and one more question. I have every piece of my equipment spiked with the Audiopoints in a Michael Green rack. The B&W's are spiked with the Audiopoints, too. It makes a noticeable difference in the tightness of the sound. What did you think of the A308cr CD player as a transport vs. the Theta Data Basic II? The used Theta has to be a lot cheaper, and I can't see the advantage of spending more for the MF 308cr CD player to get the transport. I emailed Signal Path and they said: "I get this question a lot. The fact is, the DAC in the 308 adds very little to the overall cost of the unit, so we still recommend the 308 as a great transport as well. You still get choke regulation with the 308 used as a transport and you will love it. You are correct in that the 308, due to it's mass and top end Sony transport makes a better transport that the 3.2." It's hard to believe a DAC with upsampling is a minor part of the $3000.00 price.