You Oracle has probably been bested by a lot of turntable designs in the past 10 years. I suggest you trade it in for a Teres and also buy a spare bearing. That should give you the relability, peace of mind, and duty cycle you need. You will also likely see better performance as well. Your comparision to the Porsche is flawed (although not totally). Comparisons to cars are actually poor analogies. TT performance in the past 10 years has advanced more than automobile performance has (in the 20-30 years, using your cited Prosche example).
It needs a strobe light (Common! Even 100 dollars TT would have it as BASIC).
And BTW, my music hall is a $300list (I paid less than that by a decent margin) table and I didn't get a strobe light or a strobe pattern. I suggest you heed the advice and either get Teres replacement parts (likley better than the Oracle counterparts) or just outright get a Teres and be done with it.
So from where is that 4000 dollars price tag?! Is this price for acrylic rectangle base with alluminium flywheel on it? I just don't get it.
That's basically what I thought too. I would dump that table and get something better. I briefly looked at an Oracle, but I think it's design and performance has come and gone and thus due to maintenance and upgrade cost - it would represent a poor value proposition in my mind.
Half of the music is supplied by the vinyl. The other half is supplied by the turntable. It has to spin the vinyl as true as possible and mantain speed against motor flucuations and stylus drag (and other design constraints). There are a number of reasons why turntables (motors, bearings, plinths, platters, controllers, resonance controls, etc) cost so much to do right.
Another thing that gets me thinking is why should a phono stage cost as much as they do to get something decent? Of course it appears that amplifying and RIAA equilizing very low level phono signals is harder that it appears to be at a quick cursory glance. A TT is no different.