SACD 2...for those who have not heard

Bad news as far as I am concerned, just what we don't need.
http:/www.highfidelityreview.com/news/news.asp?newsnumber=19363192

ears07-22-2003 1:24am

bluechriss2003 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 4 posts 07-22-2003 at 07:40pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Pleasing audiohpiles and making money are not mutually exclusive...
thsalmon Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 348 posts 07-22-2003 at 09:21pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete As long as they don't make me use a video monitor to navigate the disk or compromise sonics, they can include as as many pictures on the disk as they like.
ben_campbell Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 1,169 posts 07-22-2003 at 10:06pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Does it mean though Sony already have doubts about SACD breaking through?
bld63 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 109 posts 07-22-2003 at 10:18pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I have always thought the only reason SACD (and DVDA) have made it this far is copy right protection for the record companies. The fact that they sound better than Cd's (while a bonus) is certainly not going to assure the success of either media.
ears OP Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 341 posts 07-22-2003 at 11:22pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete SACD 2.....better known as the RIAA seal of approval. Budrew, after looking at my post, that should read they have it backwards Sony/Phillips and not you. Sorry about that.