Sub-sat system the ultimate compromise ?


Stand mounted speakers create the best imaging and floorstanders produce full range sound. Do you think a "well integrated" sub-sat system the answer to both objectives? Let us know your opinion and the best sub-sat system you have ever heard.
stokjoc
I'm in the anti-sub camp.I have Aerial 10ts. With the right equipment they go pretty low. The bass must have increased many times over,since I first got these speakers. AND, for me, it isn't quantity; it's quality.I've heard some HTs with enough bass to flap my clothes,press in on my chest. This isn't for me.
I run Sonus Faber Extremas with a REl Stentor sub. The Rel is seemless and completely transparent Athough I beleive that using stand mounted speakers with a sub is the best way to go it does have its disadvantages. It just doesnt move as much air as a full range speaker. The rel gives you quality over quanity but I beleive the perfect system would have both.
I use BOTH. 8 foot tall Acoustat 2+2s which go down to about 30 Hz, crossed over to a Legacy sub which is -2 dB at 16 Hz. Pinpoint imaging is not my main goal as I don't hear this in the concert hall. My priorities are "air", inner detail, dynamic range. Stage width and depth are more than adequate thanks to the Theta Gen Va.