Differences between BW N804 and BW N805?


Besides the low frecuency extension, is there any other difference between these two speakers in terms of overall presentation? Is the midrange and treble the same on both? or, is the midrange on one more forward than on the other one? Thanks for any input.
ragu12226ff
Thanks all for the responses. Chazzbo, you recommend the REVEL M20's and say they are different to the N805. What are those differences? Thanks again.
No Contest! With the right electronics, there is a huge difference. The n805 is just a monitor, better suited to HT imo. But the 804 is a good stand alone speaker, better depth, range, sound stage. For the price of the 805, you're better off putting that $ into a better speaker. If you don't like the 804, there are plenty of other good speakers in the same price range.
joeb

Classe Ca 300 amp
Classe cp 50 pre-amp
Classe CDP .5 player
BW N804's front
(BW 602 rears for HT, BW lc6 center, BW asw 500 sub)
Revel M20's well it'sbeen a while but they seem to have a dryer presentation that isn't flat.Tweeter adjustment is added plus.But the 805's are able (with power) to go a bit lower with more slam I am just not sure if they are as flat as Revel's.Hey in this price range Maggie 1.6's if I had a dedicated room and add a subb latter well that maybe way to.Also and I hope ragu is listening the Audio Physic Sparks are KILLER for the $2K range.But me well if I was doing HT 805's would fit a sane budget but if I could clock some overtime at work I'd buy a used set of 803N's for $3500.Itergrated from top to bottom with beautiful deep soundstage and good imaging.I think that 805's @$2K and 803's@$5K list are the winners.But the 804 as I mentioned before is a nice spaker where in the old series the two middle speakers (804 and 803 Matrix made up until three years ago) weren't wothy of consideration.