Coincident vs Silverline vs Ref 3a

I own the Coincident Super Eclipse (original version) and have heard the Ref 3A DeCappos at length (orig and "i" versions) in a couple of set-ups.

John_l described the DeCappo sound pretty well. If I had to pick one descriptor that stuck in my mind about the DeCappo sound, it would be one that John_l also used: lightweight. It's a nice, easy-to-like sound, but it lacks dynamic punch and low-end authority.

The Coincidents, Super Eclipses anyway, are anything but lightweight or lacking in dynamics. They are lively, authorative, and perhaps a bit unrefined on top--in the original version. With the right tube amplification and smooth cabling and upstream electronics, the Coincident Supers can be highly musically engaging speakers. They sort of draw you in and make you participate in the music. Not for polite, background stuff. The upper-end presence in the Supers is nothing like the forwardness of the Merlin floor standers or Chapman T-7's, but it does require careful mating to the rest of the system.

In a small room, with intimate music, maybe in an apartment/condo, I would prefer the Ref 3A DeCappo i. For larger, more demanding music, in a smooth, tube system with about 100 watts, the Supers are tough to beat.

No direct experience with Silverline.

Hi Art,
I own the siverline Sonata MK.ll for close to two years now.
They never fail to please me in every sonic way. Yes, there are better speakers out there but not at this price level. I have heard the Coincident's Victory and was impressed by them but I still would not give up my Silverline's for them. I have not heard the Ref 3's.
Good Luck.

Thank you all for your responses. I have just ordered Silverline Sonatina II. Seemed the best given size of my condo living area (not so intimate) and my desire to use low powered amps. Victory and Ref 3a were very close contendors and I may try them out when given a chance.