B W 802N versus 801M

I also have 801 III w/North Creeks and auditioned the 801N and 802N. I still prefer the Matrix in that I think they are more "lively" and have the "snap" I seem to loose with the Nautilus. I think the Nautilus are more controled for sure, but maybe not for their own good. This would definately depend on your system and your expectations of it. If you have to have the Nautilus go for it, but if it isn't broke don't fix it.
I was always wanting to know what the Krell bass alignment filters would do for the matrix?

Thanks for the response. I am running the Cal amp, a McIntosh MX-132 preamp and the McIntosh DVD. I notice the M801's need more power than I have, odd, but true.

So as I expect, I lose a bit on the bottom end, but gain in the clarity of the mid/high frequency of the Nautilus line.
I love the M801's, but was hoping for a bit cleaner sound at HIGH levels.

Worthy?

If you want better resolution, cleaner highs, better bass, you must upgrade your front end before you worry about the speakers.

Upgrade my front end? What is the recommendations?

Thanks,
Dan

I think Audio Magazine did a review of the 802N in Feb '99. And I also think they compared the 802N to the 801 Matrix. You might want to see if you can track down a re-print from a local B&W dealer or better yet take a pair home and audition them yourself. :-) Good luck. - Dan