Dunlavy SC-IV vs. Aerial 10T characteristics

Nice review, thanks piezo.

I had both in my living room at the same time to compare, I would sell the speaker that lost the shootout. I first had the Aerial 10T (which replaced B/W 801 mk3), then later replaced them with the Dunlavy 4's (second version). The 10T's had a 'gutsier' bass, but over all I preferred the 4's sound, especially for jazz and vocals.
The Dunlavys give you more definition vs Aerial's volume.
That said, I am currently using Maggie 3.6R's.

Wings:
What amplification are you using with your 3.6´s?

Please take this with a grain of salt. I auditoned these on the same day in different rooms with different electronics. My impression was that the Aerials were more dynamic and the Dunlavys more coherent. The soundstage of the Aerials was more gounded, the sound stage of the Dunlavys more ethereal. I enjoyed both. My prejudice puts much emphisis on coherence. IMHO for home theatre: Aerial, for music: Dunlavy.

Sol322, I am using A Theta Dreadnaught five channel amp,
I biamp the 3.6's, leaving one channel of the amp unused.