Any comparison between Audes/Gershman/Triangle?

Thank you very much to both, Chazzbo and Tracer. I also had the Maggies in my second tier, but I am now in the mood of moving away from planars. I really enjoyed the Aerius for five years, but when I replaced them with Silverline Sonatas in my main system, I again felt in love with spkeakers with more speed or dynamics of whatever word specialist use to describe it.
Thank you Tracer for your comparison. I have a better idea now. Pablo.

I auditioned the Triangle Celius with CJ tubes a few months back. Thought it was clear transparent and imaged well but absolutely horrible when you turned it up. The sound basically disintergrated with no bass.

I would say the Blues has the transparency and immediacy of the Celius BUT can rock a little better and can be turned up without breaking up. Bass is alot better too.

I bought the BLues.
See mey full review on Audioreview.com
Regards,
Rrodmanr

Triangles are all about speed,detail,and refinement...for box speakers...they are very transparent and image very well...however...their low end lacks impact...and sounds a bit hollow...very similiar to hi end Monitor Audio...if you are moving away from the "planar" sound which shares similiar characterics...I would suggest a "warmer" sounding speaker...such as Vandersteen 2ce Sigs...or Meadowlark Hotrod Kestrals...

Yes, you could give the Vienna Acoustics Mozart a look, very nice sound, very musical and easier to find then the Audes Blues on the used market. I know because I bought the Audes Blues new. Good hunting.