Pro/Con Floorstanding VS Monitor, which's better?


If both speakers have the same design, i.e MTM or any one tweeter and 2 mid subs, what is the benefit of the floorstanding over monitor speakers (so except for the cabinet, everything else is the same)?

I would think that a floorstander would go a bit deeper, but not sure if that's correct.

Also which one should be a better speaker, over all?

thanks,

Ake
ake
I've had both. Monitors are easier on the eyes. Well made ones are elegant. Floorstanders dominate the space they populate. They're more dynamic. All I can suggest is walk the walk and discover which you prefer for your environment.
One of the audio magazines (I forget which, but I think it was British) recently did a comparison of comparable models within 4 or 5 major speaker brands; that is, for example, they compared a Proac monitor to the Proac floorstander with similar speaker elements. In all the cases, the reviewer preferred the monitor, and the monitor cost less. Sorry I can't pinpoint the publication; perhaps you can find it online.
Davetherave, What Hi-Fi did this last year. They liked the B&W CDM7 over the CDM1. I remember because all others they liked monitor over floorstander.