Revel M20 or Meadowlark Shearwaters?

I have not heard the Shearwaters, but own the M20s. The M20s are excellent speakers: neutral, extended highs, good midbass, detailed. I've got mine 18" from the back wall--no problems in my room, but my room is fairly large and well damped, so YMMV. The M20s just seem to get better every time I upgrade my associated equipment (cables, pre/amp, etc.).

Have a look at www.soundstage.com. The just reviewed a new speaker from Focus Audio FS-688 which is a bookshelf speaker just like the Revels. The review appears to be quite a rave. Interestingly enough, the reviewer also make mention of the Revel M20's.

Don't no anything about the Shearwaters. I, too, own the M20s. Amazing speakers. Unfortunately I have to keep mine closer to the wall than I'd like to, because of the nature of my living room. As close as they are to the wall (12") they still sound wonderful. Don't use the Revel stands. They are poor. Read my review of the Sistrum Mini Monitor Platforms. Don't skimp on the stands. They are a significant extension of your speakers. peace, warren

I have heard both. They are two very diferent speakers. Of the two, the Shearwaters offer a fuller and more dynamic sound. They are more involving. The M20's are nice, clean, full range, but not as exciting. They also require a stands. The Meadowlars really work well with tubes. I doubt you would need a sub with either. And, as Warrenh said, don't skimp on the stands. They are critical. Shearwaters will need good spikes. It all depends on your ears, budget, room inteaction and the rest of your system.