Kharma, Wilson Sophia, JM Labs I'm confussed????

I think a used Kharma 2.0 or 2.1 would work nicely. Easy load,good bass,exceptional mids and highs and will work great in a medium size room.

I have put in dedicated 20 amp lines to the room. I also run everything through a PS audio power plant. The room has had extra insulation, and I'm having my audio guy tune it a little more. The truth is I'm greedy. The set up sounds fantastic today. I just love the full sound of the larger speakers, but the speed and clarity of the Micros may be hard to beat. When I said the full sound I was referring to the total set up and not the REL. The REL does a great job of filling in the bottom range. I just heard the new Divas. To be honest I like the micros with the sub better. Don't we all want everything??

The AG horns come with subwoofers (must get the newer CTRL 225 subs) with controls for bass volume and roll off frequency. In your room, the Unos would be great (do not be tempted to go for the bigger horns [Duos or Trios] in your room - it's too small). Set them up well and they'll fill your room with music.

FWIW I just went through much of the same thing. I was looking at a little different group of speakers, but I bought a pair of Kharma Ceramique 1.0 from a gentleman here on AudiogoN. I narrowed my choices from the Wilson Watt/Puppies, Sony SS M9ED, and B&W Signature 30's. After my looking and studying, I have yet to hear anyone say the Kharma's were not a great speaker, while listeners are more divided about the others.

Good luck!

Nrchy:I have to agree ,I actually own the Kharma 1.0 also and recommended the 2.0 or 2.1 due to the actual closeness of sound to the 1.0. and the room size mentioned. I demo-ed 2.0 3.0 and 1.0 and they all sounded exceptional but haveing a large room with high ceilings I opted for the 1.0.
I am sure that all the speakers mentioned will do well ,but most of the Kharma owners tell you once you buy one,the only thing better is another more expensive Kharma. They are that magical...