Thiel 3.5 verses Thiel 2 2


I know there are many variables involved, but would anyone like to give their opinion on which speaker they feel is the best of the two all around?
Thanks
david99
smr_nb- I have a pair of 3.5's for sale right now but I have the chance to trade them for the 2.2's.
Instead of you trying to sell them to me,why dont you spring for 3 bucks and list them?
Hey Dave, relax big guy...your comment is mean spirited. Not his....peace, warren
David: After looking at your ad, I would not think that the 2 2s (I should not have said 2.2, as Bose sued Thiel over that "point" between the 2s and got Thiel to change the name--sorry, Bose, it won't happen again) would be a substantial improvement over the 3.5s. Updating a crossover, even with the same spec'd parts, is likely to result in a substantially better-performing unit, although you'd obviously be in a better position to know from hearing it. Since you know the sound of the 3.5s, I'd summarize the difference by saying the 2 2 is less spacious-sounding, a little more coherent and a little less bright, with slightly less extended but better quality bass. If your listening biases don't take you below 30-40 hz, it is a better speaker.