Yeah, what Newbee sez : )
A speaker that presents a nominal 4 ohm load will draw twice as much power as a speaker with a nominal 8 ohm impedance. Since the amplifier has to work harder i.e. generates more heat to deliver twice the power, you aren't gaining anything in terms of system efficiency when you go to a lower impedance load with the same sensitivity.
Other than that, you really have to look at how they are rating the sensitivity of the speaker. An 8 ohm speaker with 2.83 volts fed into it that is 88 dB's is measurably more efficient than a 4 ohm speaker that is rated at 88 dB's with the same 2.83 volts. The only time that you can compare sensitivity ratings between different speakers is if they specifically state that they are tested with 1 watt of input. Using a "standardized" voltage like 2.83 is NOT "universal" due to variances in impedance. The 1 watt method takes the impedance into consideration and compensates accordingly.
Another factor to think about is damping factor, which is a HIGHLY misunderstood term. That's something different though, so i don't want to get into that here. I'll just say that a lower impedance speaker has more potential to distort the output of the amplifier as the loading conditions vary dynamically. This is why "beefy" amplifiers typically work best into lower impedance speakers i.e. they typically have a lower output impedance than a smaller amp. The greater the difference in output impedance of the amp and the input impedance of the speaker, the more stable the circuit will become. Since tube amps can sometimes have output impedances as high as 2 - 4 ohms and are typically of a very limited current design, you can see why they would work best with a speaker of higher impedance. Otherwise, you run into problems with the speaker "modulating" the output of the amp. Not only will this change tonal balance and frequency response, but it will also alter distortion and transient response characteristics. This is yet another reason why some components are VERY system dependent i.e. they aren't nearly as stable and require a phenomenal amount of attention to avoid aggravating this problem. The ASL amps and some Cary's come to mind here.
All things being equal, one is typically better off with a high efficiency, higher impedance speaker that isn't real reactive. Having said that, i don't know of any speakers that are made like that which i really like. While this is obviously a matter of personal preference, it just goes to show how theory and reality sometimes don't jive. Sean
>
A speaker that presents a nominal 4 ohm load will draw twice as much power as a speaker with a nominal 8 ohm impedance. Since the amplifier has to work harder i.e. generates more heat to deliver twice the power, you aren't gaining anything in terms of system efficiency when you go to a lower impedance load with the same sensitivity.
Other than that, you really have to look at how they are rating the sensitivity of the speaker. An 8 ohm speaker with 2.83 volts fed into it that is 88 dB's is measurably more efficient than a 4 ohm speaker that is rated at 88 dB's with the same 2.83 volts. The only time that you can compare sensitivity ratings between different speakers is if they specifically state that they are tested with 1 watt of input. Using a "standardized" voltage like 2.83 is NOT "universal" due to variances in impedance. The 1 watt method takes the impedance into consideration and compensates accordingly.
Another factor to think about is damping factor, which is a HIGHLY misunderstood term. That's something different though, so i don't want to get into that here. I'll just say that a lower impedance speaker has more potential to distort the output of the amplifier as the loading conditions vary dynamically. This is why "beefy" amplifiers typically work best into lower impedance speakers i.e. they typically have a lower output impedance than a smaller amp. The greater the difference in output impedance of the amp and the input impedance of the speaker, the more stable the circuit will become. Since tube amps can sometimes have output impedances as high as 2 - 4 ohms and are typically of a very limited current design, you can see why they would work best with a speaker of higher impedance. Otherwise, you run into problems with the speaker "modulating" the output of the amp. Not only will this change tonal balance and frequency response, but it will also alter distortion and transient response characteristics. This is yet another reason why some components are VERY system dependent i.e. they aren't nearly as stable and require a phenomenal amount of attention to avoid aggravating this problem. The ASL amps and some Cary's come to mind here.
All things being equal, one is typically better off with a high efficiency, higher impedance speaker that isn't real reactive. Having said that, i don't know of any speakers that are made like that which i really like. While this is obviously a matter of personal preference, it just goes to show how theory and reality sometimes don't jive. Sean
>