Tubes vs Solid State - Imaging, Soundstaging, 3D


I have limited experience with tubes having had a couple tube amps with Gold Lion KT88s and EL34s. The majority of amps I have owned have been solid state. In my experience, SS always seems to image more sharply and offer the deepest, clearest field.

Is this common?
128x128michaelkingdom
Charles, I don't share your view that Wolf thought I was "kidding around". He is an adult. He made a choice and knew exactly what he was saying. Only a sick individual makes fun of someone's grief.

Thanks tube for your condolences.
Mel,
I have no idea what's in someone else's mind/heart so I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt. You and your family have my sympathy.
Charles,
Michaelkingdom, another data point for you. I’ve always been curious but leery of tube stuff, so have always had SS. It’s been a steady climb over several years to decent gear. Some changes brought immediate grins, some took a little time to internalize, like higher resolution/closer to the source isn’t always more fun to me, but usually brings better imaging and space. Regardless, the sound eventually becomes de facto and I can appreciate it for what it is. Still, there was that nagging itch to try tubes.

Yes, this is another tube testimonial. I recently put together a second (cheap) system and decided it was the perfect time to take the plunge – no worries if the things failed. Let me just say that the clichés about tubes are true. I’m not saying this system is better than my SS gear, but even with older, lower level source components and speakers, way cheap cabling and no power conditioning, I can hear good things I don’t with SS, including a quality to the imaging and sense of space. It comes down to instrument tone and the note-to-note flow. Someone said it similarly earlier, the instrument’s image and the space itself sound more real – better tone and more gradual decay, more fun listening.