I still use one, but I wonder if their days are numbered. To those who have removed the preamp from their system, have there been any regrets? Anyone gone back to using a preamp after having removed it?
@ Almarg, Hi, Thankyou very much, I have enjoyed your help, I know who to look up for all things audio now, I hope you do not mind if I ever needed some help, I may be able to ask you for it, Happy Holidays.
@ swampwalker, Hi, sorry my post did not meet your standards of puntuations, LOL!,, never knew I needed to be thorough!, It's ok, I do not care to be so thorough with posting on a thread, of course If I were writting a book to make money, I would care to do better!, You gave me a good laugh, I needed that, Happy Holidays to you.
I'd wager whether "Bit stripping" of the signal with 24-bit digital dithered volume controls isn't mostly of academic order (32-bit dittos wouldn't, in this regard, pose any in-use limitiations, at all) - that is, where it is stated it's very often based on a theoretical non-listening experience foundation. Only high sensitive speakers and high-gain combinations could tend to pose a possible sonic limitation here, and highly sensitive speakers is not what overflows the market as is.. For what it's worth my own setup includes moderately sensitive speakers (~93dB), and it sounds terrific at lower volumes with the digital volume attenuation named above.
If for whatever reason one doesn't like the final sonic outcome where digital attenuation is involved without a separate hardware preamp, the bit stripping (i.e.: truncation) is by all accounts not a factor as much, or at all as the totality of this implementation; if one has carefully tuned a setup through the use of a hardware preamp the negation of this preamp (leaving in its place a software-based digital ditto) could easily tilt the sound in a direction reflecting back negatively on the preamp as a source of more or less outspoken coloration and synergy-effect, than what is an inherent limitation of its digital stand-in solution. I'd rather rid my setup of a hardware preamp so long as the analog output stage of the source can be made to drive the poweramp suitable (which is certainly possible) - hereby doing the same as the hardware preamp, yet without an extra hardware component and set of cables.
another situation is that I cannot use typical tube pre-amps or sources direct to amp, or I would have to activate the coupling capacitors that are not active inside the amp to protect is from tube unstableness!
Audiolabyrinth, best I can make out, this is some form of myth that solid state people seem to transmit. Its not actually true.
In the case of our preamp, its output is direct-coupled and servo-controlled. We've had people using it with all manner of solid state amps over the last 20 years; doesn't seem to be a problem. FWIW our MP-1 was the first balanced line preamp made. It can drive the Krell just fine.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.
