To Vandersteen or not to Vandersteen


So. I'm thinking of floorstanders and though I've never heard Vandersteen's in the flesh, they seem to be calling me if I do decide to make the switch from my Reference 3A de Capo's.

Anyone want to sound off on Vans? The Sig 3A? The 2? Any recommendations?

Thank you. And please - no admonishments about buying speakers unheard. Both the Reference 3A's and the Triangles before I bought unheard and were delighted with both. I trust reviews and word-of-mouth.
128x128simao
You all have been quite helpful. Thanks for the feedback. And as a former Maggie 3.6R owner, I'm always seduced by the big planars; maybe one day I'll go back to them.
I think it would be a bit of a sideways step with the Decapo being a bit more neutral and the Vandy having a bit more low bass
I had the 2 Sigs and now have Thiel 2.4s which are much more dynamic and present with a much more stable image. Good for you for choosing time and phase coherent designs!
find them cheap preferably Sig 3A's so you can play them and sell them if you don't like them. they like power and they like medium to large listening room. the best sweet spot distance is around 10' and same applies to apart.
to me the definition and resolution is perfect while bass is somewhat slow. they're best for large symphony orchestras. great with 60wpc+ tube amp or 100wpc+ solid state amp. In my past experience at Audioconnection of Verona NJ John Rutan was demoing them with Quicksilver M60, Rogue Magnum 88, Bryston 3b-st or Ayre(can't recall model). Please tell which amp you're going to use