Speaker imaging


Considering my speakers definitely image better when I am not wearing my glasses leads me to conclude imaging ain't really real but relies on the power of suggestion. Sort of like some folks who prefer to listen with the lights off. Any comments?
128x128zavato
I have heard most of the speakers on the market. I've recently changed some things in my own system. I have Proac SuperTowers that I'm selling and I can PROMISE you that it's not in your head. My speakers disappear as good as most out there. It's about set up and your room too. Some speakers do some things right, but never disappear. I changed to a DAC and Niagara balanced cables into my Ayre integrated and the sound is MUCH wider and deeper than it's ever been and I have run NAD integrated (also selling off) and Quicksilver Silver Mono's what stage and image as good as most tubes out there (again selling, lol) and I didn't expect my new system to be as 'large' as the tube stuff, but I was wrong. That's not in my head (actually it really is in our heads).

Go listen at a brick and mortar store and you'll hear the differences.
By that same logic, it's a recording, so none of it is real.

The only thing that really matters is what you hear. Imaging is a big part of enabling a stereo setup to deliver the best sound possible.

Its like going to the movies these days. 3-D done well can add a lot to the enjoyment of certain movies in particular. Or some might not bite and prefer standard 2-d. Neither is real, but both are differing imperfect renderings of reality, to different extents.