Size of Midrange Drivers


Why, in this day of super materials, do designers still use
mini midrange drivers?
Can we expect realistic dynamics from a five inch speaker?
My former Audio Artistry Dvorak's used dual eight-inch
midranges (D'Appolito config, paper cone) and sounded fine.
I'm thinking great dynamics = lots of air moved quickly.
I'd like to hear dual eight inch diamond coated berilium with 1000 watts behind them!
I think when we're at the point where the wave launch gives you a skin peel,
we'll be close to proper dynamics.
128x128dweller
Phusis,
thanks for the info & the excerpts from the 6mooons.com review. If nothing else, the speaker finish is very nice to look at.
In a similar view both in respect to "Made in Austria" & beautiful looking finishes - at RMAF 2013 I heard a very nice sounding stand mount speaker by Brodmann Acoustics called the FS from their Festival Series. In that hotel room it did much better than its floor-standing bigger brother which they were playing on Sunday morning. Some links to that speaker:
http://brodmannacoustics.com/index.php?id=116

http://www.stereophile.com/content/brodmann-acoustics-festival-series

Maybe I liked it 'coz it has a 5" midrange?? LOL!! :-)
here's a nice write-up on that speaker:
http://hans-deutsch-akustikforschung.com/pics/tests/avmentor.pdf
Look at its step response - exactly what a time-coherent step response should look like (note that it uses a 6dB/octave slope).
Bombaywalla --

They take an interesting approach, Brodmann Acoustics, and seem fairly priced. Never heard them.

One of the more memorable sonic demoes I've had came from the Peak Consult Kepheus at their home facility in Denmark. The twin Audio Technology 5" midrange units presented some of the most natural (and dynamic) mids I've encountered - certainly coming from cones - just as they are beautiful and coherent sounding overall. Although steeply(!) priced it's beyond me why these handcrafted speakers aren't referred to more often, if at all in the "audiophile arena;" it can't be the high price, for that alone seems to have its drawing power all by itself. One suspects that what sounds natural simply isn't interesting enough..

But in the end, to my ears, nothing trumps the ease, tone, clarity and relaxed power from a well-implemented waveguide/horn, preferably conical variants, and larger cones. This sums it up nicely:

I am amazed today that 99% of all "audiophile" speakers are the basic "monkey coffin" cones and domes in a box that have defined the industry for the last forty years. This is fine for general consumer stuff, but, no matter what the price, you can only get so much out of a 5" cone midrange and a 1" dome tweeter, and it isn't enough, in my opinion, for even modest ambitions. It's just the physical nature of the elements involved.

http://www.newworldeconomics.com/archives/2013/111713.html

"It's just the physical nature of the elements involved" - indeed...
Phusis, we agree to disagree (which is just fine with me). :-)
I'm happy that you subscribe to some Nathan Lewis' opinion on this matter but it's just his opinion & I have no idea what his exposure & knowledge of audio is?