Far out, John :-)
Well, I guess if one wants to design an interconnect that sounds different than just about everyone else's, that's one way to do it. IMO, though, both the design and the rationale for it that are stated in the review are completely ridiculous.
Which is not to rule out the possibility that in some systems, and for some listeners, that interconnect might produce results that are subjectively appealing.
In any event, Mr. Sanders gets credit for being right about at least one thing in his paper. IMO, of course.
Best regards,
-- Al
Well, I guess if one wants to design an interconnect that sounds different than just about everyone else's, that's one way to do it. IMO, though, both the design and the rationale for it that are stated in the review are completely ridiculous.
Which is not to rule out the possibility that in some systems, and for some listeners, that interconnect might produce results that are subjectively appealing.
In any event, Mr. Sanders gets credit for being right about at least one thing in his paper. IMO, of course.
Best regards,
-- Al