Here's another way to look at it:
With Option 1, you are connecting two Ocellia Reference cables in parallel.
With Option 2, in effect you would be connecting two cables that are no longer Ocellia References in parallel, since with the + and - conductors no longer being closely twisted together, you are in effect redesigning the cable. The "redesigned" pair of cables will have much higher inductance than in Option 1, and I suspect it would also have significantly higher inductance than if you were running just one cable per channel rather than two.
At a 2 meter length it might not make much difference either way, but why "redesign" an excellent cable, with unpredictable results?
Regards,
-- Al
With Option 1, you are connecting two Ocellia Reference cables in parallel.
With Option 2, in effect you would be connecting two cables that are no longer Ocellia References in parallel, since with the + and - conductors no longer being closely twisted together, you are in effect redesigning the cable. The "redesigned" pair of cables will have much higher inductance than in Option 1, and I suspect it would also have significantly higher inductance than if you were running just one cable per channel rather than two.
At a 2 meter length it might not make much difference either way, but why "redesign" an excellent cable, with unpredictable results?
Regards,
-- Al