Has education expanded your listening tastes?


This point recently came up in another thread: a member was of the opinion (if I am paraphrasing them correctly) that critical thinking plays little role in what our tastes in music might be. We like what we like and that's it. So that begs the question for me, how many of us feel that our reaction to music is primarily rooted in the emotional centers of the brain and that rational analysis of musical structure and language doesn't potentially expand our range of musical enjoyment? I ask because I am not a professional musician, but I did take a few college level music history classes, learn to play guitar in my forties (now sixty,) learn to read music on a rudimentary level of competence, study a little music theory, and enjoy reading historical biographies about composers and musicians. I can honestly say that the in the last fifteen years or so, I have greatly expanded what types of music I enjoy and that I can appreciate music I might not "love" in the emotional sense that used to dictate what I listen to. Take Berg, Schoenberg, and Webern for example. Their music doesn't sweep you away with the emotional majesty of earlier composers, but I find their intellectual rigor and organization to be fascinating and very enjoyable. Same with studying the history of American roots music, I learned a lot about our cultural history and enjoy listening to old blues and country music now. How do other's feel about this emotion vs. learning to appreciate thing?
photon46
Schubert,

You say Van the Man is dumbing down? You cannot be serious? You must have not listened to most of his non-pop/rock hit music?

As you must know we live in a fallen world and everything under the sun is corrupt and corrupted. Soldiers are not only needed, but often times required and used by our Lord to do His will on this broken planet. Not ideal, not beautiful, not lovely, but reality and needed this side of heaven. God was pleased with King David saying he was a man after his own own heart. He was a soldier and God was indeed pleased with him and his role as a soldier and King.
When it comes to music, I'd say the fewer rules, the better.

Just let it be, take it or leave it. It all works out in the end.

I was listening to some old Robert Johnson recordiI ngs last night and found myself mesmerized by his guitar playing and voice. Same happens with a lot of classical.

Each registers differently for me as it should, but the magnitude is hard to compare. Why bother? One is either moved or not by a particular piece. It can't be quantified why or how. So math for sure falls short in most things uniquely human. Spirituality included.
Soldiers do the bidding of man, nothing else, right or wrong, and often have little choice in the matter I would think.
Soldiers? Check out the Old Testament! I don't like to talk religion, I'm just saying. :)

Cheers
Mapman, soldiers do and have done the bidding of man is a truth. Soldiers can also do the bidding of God. Yes, this truth has been perverted by man with all kinds of unspeakable things being done in the name of God and God was no part of it. Man's error however does not nullify the truth that God has and will continue to move as He pleases through soldiers in this fallen world.

If the Bible is understood as relevant, truth, and inspired by God, then no other conclusion is possible. If one does not think the Bible is truth, then yes I suppose any thought can be perceived as truth.

Over and over in scripture soldiers were used by God to carry out
His purpose, not man's. This is undeniable, thus one must not believe in the authority of scripture to question this truth.

We are free to believe or not believe in the Bible and what it shares about our Creator. I happen to believe it and to stay consistent with it .