Has education expanded your listening tastes?

Rok2id, I would love to hear their perspective. I work within a very large University art department with practitioners of many art forms, so I obviously have great respect for the opinions of professional musicians and educators. As educators, we have to find ways to communicate with each other across our particular specialities and hopefully instill love and knowledge of the arts in both students who are arts majors as well as students who are taking arts courses because of graduation requirements. I'm not sure what level of expertise qualifies someone to be worthy of public commentary in your mind, but if educators were to suggest that students keep their mouths shut and their less than fully informed opinions to themselves until they had reached a predetermined level of artistic maturity, we'd not be doing a very good job of educating them by today's standards. I fail to see why adults attempting to educate themselves about an art form should also be relegated to the silent corner unless they pre-qualify as an expert opinion. It's just art we're talking about here, not as if we are risking spreading bad advice about how a disease is spread. I would also advise a slight tempering of reverence for the opinions of art professionals as oracles of absolute truth. I've worked with many artists and known a few composers, people who have been in history and textbooks for decades. They were and are subject to prejudices, biases, and irrational exuberances in spite of having great erudition in their specialty. No disrespect meant to Frogman and Learsfool, just making a general point.

As far as expanding a person's listening tastes (likes / dislikes), Maybe 'Exposure' would be a more appropriate word than 'education'.

I think most people are exposed to music as opposed to being educated about music. Can you dislike a certain music even after being educated about it? I say absolutely. But you cannot stop liking music you love, even after being educated about it.

I feel the education thing is just nice to know. Of course COMPOSERS are exempt from this theory. :) They are the creators and have an entirely different perspective.

Cheers

Schubert,

You say Van the Man is dumbing down? You cannot be serious? You must have not listened to most of his non-pop/rock hit music?

As you must know we live in a fallen world and everything under the sun is corrupt and corrupted. Soldiers are not only needed, but often times required and used by our Lord to do His will on this broken planet. Not ideal, not beautiful, not lovely, but reality and needed this side of heaven. God was pleased with King David saying he was a man after his own own heart. He was a soldier and God was indeed pleased with him and his role as a soldier and King.

When it comes to music, I'd say the fewer rules, the better.

Just let it be, take it or leave it. It all works out in the end.

I was listening to some old Robert Johnson recordiI ngs last night and found myself mesmerized by his guitar playing and voice. Same happens with a lot of classical.

Each registers differently for me as it should, but the magnitude is hard to compare. Why bother? One is either moved or not by a particular piece. It can't be quantified why or how. So math for sure falls short in most things uniquely human. Spirituality included.

Soldiers do the bidding of man, nothing else, right or wrong, and often have little choice in the matter I would think.