Why Do Musicians Still Need Record Companies?


.
With the proliferation of downloading & streaming of digital music...why does an artist still need a record company? I mean, if it's just a digital file, they could sell it themselves online.
.
128x128mitch4t
Truth is, they don't. Which is why record companies are bleeding to death. But....

Record companies still represent the state of the art in record promotion. They generate radio play and overall"buzz" for an emerging artist. They also export hit artists from domestic successes to global markets.

So, musicians don't need record companies (and plenty of acts go straight to iTunes these days) but a record company can still help break a record.
Administrative support is a big reason. I've heard more than a few artists state that managing all the issues involved in accounting, legal, taxes, marketing etc. is considerably more time consuming when you forego the label and take on the direct marketing approach.
I know musicians that can barely drive or do any other type of job. All they do is practice 10hrs per day to bring new repertoire or perfect the existing one.
It sounds so simple on the face of it: just sell it yourself online. The reality is that promoting and managing any artist's career requires a skill set beyond that of many if not most artists. Theoretically it's possible to self manage effectively, the reality is that few know how at the outset of their career to develop themselves and make business decisions that are in their long term self interest. As previously mentioned, expertise is needed in tax, accounting, marketing, & legal issues.
I know some who are long-term weed smokers and like all pot-heads suffer from the delusion that their mental acuity
has not suffered.