Historical look at amps


The amplifier evolution thread reminded me of the history of amplifier circuits that has occured over the last 20 years. Lots of changes but the one that stuck in my mind was the change in feedback circuits. In the early 1980s a good amp like Crown, McIntosh, Phase Linear etc all had large amounts of feedback and distortion levels of 0.00001% IM and THD. These amps sounded bad and the question was raised (and still is) why objective measurement didn't jib with listening tests. A Finnish engineer (OTTELA) came up with a new measurement called Transient IM Distortion (TIM). I wont go into the details but it did show that large amounts of feedback which made static IM and THD measurements good, made music waveforms bad. The result has been today's amps with low levels of global and local feedback, and better sound but with IM distortion levels of only 0.01% (and of course tube amps with more even then odd distortion harmonics). Just recently Ayre, and probably other companys are offering zero feedback designs. Feedback circuits have been with us since the 1920s and we are now just elliminating this basic design feature in modern amps and preamps.
keis
Aball, the Ayre products have no local or global feedback. That was my point. They now do exist and I don' believe Ayre will be alone for long. If you don't believe me go to Ayre.com (no I'm not an Ayre rep but I do own a K1xe.)

Ayre has zero feedback designs in their video circuits also.
The Ayre amps use local feedback, sometimes called degeneration, and no loop feedback.

The Stasis amps had no feedback from the speaker output to the signal input, but instead had feedback loops applied to "building blocks".

The new generation of so-called "digital" amps (the self-oscillating varieties) do have overall feedback loops from the output to the modulator. Some sense current, some voltage, some both.
Keis, I believe it is impossible to build a practical amp using discrete fets that doesn't use some type of feedback. I'm going to need more proof than the fact their web site uses the term "zero feedback." I sent an email to Ayre asking them to clarify. I'll let you know if they respond.

Aball, my functional amp uses zero feedback. That is the beauty of the triode vacuum tube. They are linear enough to use without any feedback.
SS uses feedback to stabilise the circuit. In the more exotic designs this f/back is local. OTOH tube circuits can be stabilised w/out any type of feedback (even there it's not plain sailing -- it requires effort).

Objective measurements: let me insist that measurements are useful and can be reliable. Depends what you're measuring FOR, i.e. it's not always for sound reproduction.

If for marketing, then you go one way. If for guessing the precision of amplified signal, you go another way (i.e. checking into amp-speaker interface matters, et alia).
A Norwegian called R. Lian had looked extensively into this matter. To a certain extend so have we all: if I'm to check for amp performance, WHAT (and how) should I measure?? Cheers
How do you figure it has to do with stabilising?? Stabilising what?

And which way do you use for marketing, and which for precision? By precision, do you mean THD numbers of 0.00001%? Seems to me that is done for marketing, as the amps in the mid-70s using that approach sounded rotten.

Some of us design it so that it sounds best to us. Whether others agree or like it is another matter. ("Some" being most every amp designer that I know.)