from solid state to tube


Hi all, it's probably a strange question but are there audiophiles who have been tube aficionados for quite a while but are now being converted to solid state? The other way around is a more common phenomenon: audiophiles who have been listening to solid state and are being converted to tubes in a late (final?) stage of their audio evolution. Some say that single ended amplification + high sensitivity speakers are the key to musical nirvana. To them the Soul of Music is then freed at last from the electro-mechanic hardware.
dazzdax
Well, I have done (almost) exactly what you said, and have only just backed off it just a bit recently. (Except I have not gone the SET amplification - high efficiency speaker route. I did it my way, to quote ole' Blue Eyes!)

I used to run all tube equipment back in the late '80s & early '90s. (Counterpoint preamp w/ CJ amp.)

Then a few years ago, in the early '90s, I went to Solid State (SS) amplification, by substituting a Levinson No. 27 amp for the CJ amp. (The tubeyness of the CJ amp finally got to me. I really wanted something that had full frequency range extension and got rid of the euphonic bloom that grew tiresome after awhile.)

A few years ago, I got back into stereos, (and especially back into vinyl), and went with an ARC LS-2 preamp and a ARC PH-3 phono preamp. I appreciated the reliability of the ARC equipment, as the Counterpoint was starting to breakdown more frequently. (Counterpoint had good sonics though, especially for the price.)

However, after a couple of years, I grew extremely tired of the tube rushing from the ARC equipment, so I went totally SS. I replaced the ARC preamps and went with an Ayre K-1X preamp, including the phono boards. (This preamp is pretty amazing, as it is both musical and detailed. The phono boards are very, very good, especially for the price. And it is dead quiet!! Yea!)
Note: At the same time, I also upgraded my old Levinson No. 27 (100 wpc) to a Levinson No. 23 (200 wpc), as my new speakers, Revel Studios, (which are not very efficient speakers), really wanted more power to really open them up. (I knew that the Levinson was pretty decent, but I realized that it was more of a placeholder, until I could figure out which amp I really wanted.)

Just a couple of weeks ago, I put the final piece in the puzzle. I upgraded to the Lamm M2.1s, which are a hybrid mono block amplifiers (1 tube in each), and they have ended my search. They have just a touch of tube sound in the mid-range, otherwise they have all the makings of a great SS amp, with none of the weaknesses (no HF glare, no grain, etc.). They have great frequency extension, and no tweaking necessary, unless you really want to play around with the one tube, which I might at some point.

At this point, I am through with my amplification portion of my stereo system. (In fact, I am almost done period, as I really like my entire system. At some point, I might upgrade the turntable and arm, but that will not be for a year or two, until I can pay off the Lamms. Yeah, they are expensive, but well worth it in my opinion!)

I am now: One Happy Camper!
(My wife is glad the journey to audio nirvana is over too, as it was getting pretty expensive in the later stages!)
I am slowly trying to add solid state components to what is a predominantly tube set-up. I started with the digital fornt-end. Now I am trying to add a solid state phono stage and a solid state amp. In addition, a vendor I trust explicitly that had made some high quality and expensive tube amps/preamps is now making solid state amps they feel have the tube sound and are dead quiet. So the question makes for an interesting discussion.
I'm doing the high powered SET with "medium" efficient speakers and like it a lot. But I'm still keeping my solid state amp around.