Hall of Fame: BIGGEST BADDEST Monster Amps


There have been a lot of posts on:

"tube amps with balls"
"amps to drive my 1 ohm, inefficient speakers"
"amps for rock and roll"
"Levinson, Krell, Bryston, Pass Labs etc"
"sounds more powerful than its rating suggests"
"despite low rating, puts out huge current" etc.

But I somehow find these threads divergent and confusing and still cant seem to short list a new set of monoblocks to biamp (low end) and COMMAND my Magneplanar Tympanis, fill up a large room with EFFORTLESS dynamics and CONTROL the bass with no debates, questions, reservations or tweaky failures.

So let's please hear your thoughts:

What are the all time, hall of fame, MONSTER power amps, where there should be no doubt whatsover about HUGE amounts, of effortlessly dynamic, clean, smooth, audiophile power.

I have to think that for the low end of biamping, this should be a solid state amp, unless someone can really suggest an unusually robust and low maintenance tube amp.

Mark Levinson 20.6?
Pass X-600's?
Bryston 7 B monoblocks?
Parasound monoblocks?

Thank you.
cwlondon
"Monster" amps should be those that are not current limited into real world loads.

The only amps made that have the ability to double current into halved impedances are those solid-state-of-the-art pieces made by Levinson and Krell. And Krell does it biased as Class A.

Rowland, McCormick, Pass, Theta and others don't do it.
Stevecham

Which models do you consider "state of the art" for induction into the "monster" hall of fame?
Of those currently available, two I would vote for include:

Levinson 33H monoblocks
Krell 750cx monoblocks
Parasounds are lightweight compared to the monsters mentioned above. If I had to choose one it would be the Gryphons, those things are... well, monsters!

But my Classe Omicron weighs almost three hundred pounds.