Passive Pre - No Regrets?

Tbg - you made a valid point. Depending on the music you listen to and your system, some aspects may be more important than the others.
I however, in my 2 week trial period, have tried all kinds of music, on my rather costly system and couldn't find a single aspect of reproduced music, that my old BAT 51SE would do better than the Placette Linestage. Not a single one !
And belive me - I have tried. I was looking especially close at things that passives are not supposed to do well - bass and dynamics, but they were both better through Placette Linestage than the BAT.

Well one thing does seem for sure. It is worth trying the PLacette to see what you think in your system, with your music, with your tastes. To me it was revelatory. IN the end you may not like the passive route for whatever reason. But it seems to me that every audiophile should at least try one if possible. What I most notice is that instead of listening for sound attributes (bass, imaging, speed, etc.) I suddenly noticed that songs are more intellegible in terms of emotion and meaning. The point of the song was clearer to me. While I always like and search for "sound" improvements, this aspect of intellegibilty seems more profound and satisfying. That's the best I can describe it.

I'm not sure how it can sound any better the the Placette Passive RVC, but I have decided to buy their Active Linestage (based on some comments and conversations I have had with other members). If you are interested, I have put my passive RVC up for sale today (January)

I am surprised that as much as you like your Placette RVC that you are selling it without knowing for sure that you'll actually like the active version better. Why not hang onto it to do a comparison and then sell the one then that you like the least.

Good advice. But I'll put money on you liking the Active at least as much and probably more.