2. amps-preamps
  3. 1163641478

Any thoughts on Krell

Just wondering if anyone out there is getting frustrated with Krells continued changing of product lines and designs. I have been a very loyal Krell user, but I am feeling that Krell has changed their business philosophy. I have coughed up a ton of dough on KPS25SC, KAS's, FPB's, and the AVS which turned out to be non upgradable. each time I settle in to these large investments, Krell changes the look and the entire line. The value of the "last version" drops like a rock for all of us users. Unlike a brand like McIntosh that has a philosphy of at least leaving the appearance the same. Perhaps I am bit sensitive on this topic. Any thoughts?
strenckr
bbmarantz
1 posts
 
I wish I had my Krell 300i back. This 400xi sounds to sweet. They took out the deep rich ooomph.
serraniruben's avatar
serraniruben
8 posts
 
Hi Oneobgyn,
Here is an extract that you said,
I have also owned literally every bit of Krell gear over the years until I went all tube. My favorites were their KPS 25SC, KRC-HR and their Reference 64 DAC and MD-10 transport. I used these with their 750 Mcx monos and the sound was at the height of the game. Had I not wanted to go all tubes I would still be right there with that gear.
Which combo is the more extended, natural, ie better KPS25 OR KRC-HR Reference64- md10?
Currently have a Krell KPS20i/L
Thanks!
Ruben
nglazer
846 posts
 
I have an FPB 300cx for more than 4 years and don't think about "upgrading" or changing it just because Krell has come out with a new (much more expensive) line. I think Krell is one of the lesser sinners in the upgrade brothel, with the FPB series having been around for 6-7 years and built to last and perform well for at least 20 years. Krell is positively saintly compared to ARC or now CJ with its top pre's.

Neal
jc51373
533 posts
 
Solution: if you like the Krell sound and don't like the frequent generations, then buy used.

Case closed.
More to discover