2. amps-preamps
  3. 1208957804

McCormack DNA-1 vs. DNA-125

A few years ago I owned a DNA-1 dlx and always regretted selling it--just a wonderfully musical amp at a sane price. After owning a number of amps , I'm thinking of going back to the McCormack to drive my Totem Forests. However, I'm wondering if the newer DNA-125 for more or less the same price used would be a better option. Anyone had the chance to compare these two?
eslaudio
kr4's avatar
kr4
3,693 posts
 
That's actually a comparison with a DNA-225.

Kal
eslaudio OP
118 posts
 
I had seen the Stereophile article before (thanks Hasse), and it is helpful in some respects. While I imagine the 225 shares a sonic signature with the 125, the significant difference in power between the two units makes me wary of assuming that the 125 would fare the same in comparison with the DNA-1.
ptmconsulting
1,000 posts
 
I would strongly recommend looking for a Rev A McCormack amp. That being said, you could get an older model and have it modded, or, if you get real lucky and act real quickly, buy one already modified here at Audiogon.

The difference between a Rev A and any of the stock models is pretty dramatic. As good as they are, they get a whole lot better.

Enjoy,
Bob
winoguy17
1,158 posts
 
I owned a DNA 1 for years and was very happy with it, but when I upgraded to the DNA 225 the difference was not subtle.While the DNA 1 is still a great amp for the $, the 225 ( and I would assume the 125 ) is far superior, especially in the lower register.
rakuennow
81 posts
 
I have read in another thread here that the DNA-125 should be comparable to the older Rev. C series. And since the Rev. C upgrades are no longer offered I always assumed that upgrade was similar to the deluxe edition. It's been a while since reading so my memory could be foggy, so take this with a grain of salt.
More to discover