Passive Preamps? Anyone?


Will kind folks point me in the direction of some really good passive preamps, or really good, small (1-2) input active pre's? I'm thinking about trying a new DAC that does not come with volume control, so, alas, I need a good pre. Thanks!
sammie
One more I forgot to mention is from ElectraPrint marketed by their Electra-Fidelity subsidiary. Three versions (at least) all very reasonably priced.

Jack Elliano, ElectraPrints guiding light is considered to be one of the industries gurus when it comes to building audio output transformers, chokes, and power transformers.
After reading 63 pages on the DIY Audio forum and speaking to George I decided to pull the trigger on the Lightspeed. Also, I figure if Nelson Pass got into the mix on LDRs it is worth checking out.

Dave, did you ever get them implemented in the active preamp. I can't remember if you posted the outcome on DIY Audio.
Clio, I acquired the LDR piece parts, but abandoned the project due to problems getting LDRs to track closely in a high-impedance volume control for a balanced tube preamp. I've been waiting on Unixman from that thread to complete a rather complex digital control system that would resolve this issue. But assuming you need a single-ended passive of around 10K impedance, the Lightspeed should do fine. Looking forward to your findings.
Actually I would have preferred balanced, but the cost was prohibitive due to the added parts and work involved. George wasn't excited about tackling the project either. I was able to get him to build me one with dual volume controls so I could have a balance option.

My DAC has an output impedance of 50 ohms and my amps an input impedance of 100k ohms. The Lightspeed should be fine I imagine.
To find eight closely matched LDRs as needed for a balanced passive, requires measuring & sorting through many dozens of pieces. The task is much simpler with a single-ended passive. Only two matched pairs of LDRs are necessary for a two channel SE passive, and variation in matching between L and R channel LDRs is noncritical. In contrast, in a balanced configuration, even small variations in LDR matching will produce poor common mode noise rejection. George understands these devices well and has probably been wise to steer clear of balanced configurations.

For those unfamiliar with the technology, an LDR is a photosensitive variable resistor, whose resistance is controlled by an adjacent LED. The volume pot on the passive preamp sends a variable control voltage to the LEDs, which determines the light intensity applied to the variable resistors. Two LDR elements per channel in a series/shunt arrangement, provide all the functionality of an expensive ladder-type attenuator based on conventional resistors. Apart from being simpler than a conventional ladder attenuator, the LDR attenuator is better insofar as there are no switch contacts in the signal path. Moreover, the sound of LDR resistors is reportedly as transparent as the best conventional resistors. Finally, as the control pot is not in the signal path, the chosen pot may be of the cheapest variety and have no impact on sound. So it's a win-win of simplicity, economy, & performance as seldom found in audio.