High Fidelity Cables CT-1designed by Rick Schultz


In December 2011,I wrote that High Fidelity cables led by cable designer Rick Schultz was putting together a new cable.The cable came to market as CT-1.The CT-1 has FINALLY made it into my system!I had obtained a version of the prototype that Rick had been working on.It blew my previous reference Genesis by Virtual Dynamics.I thought I had finally found my end with this cable.This prototype delivered to my ears "Nirvana".Could I be at the end of my quest for the ultimate sound?
No. I received two pairs of CT-1 to replace my prototypes.They went into the system this past Friday.Unable to dedicate time until Sunday listening,I stole a few moments,ducking away from company with anticipation.My guest could tell even with the music set for"ambiance"something was intriguing and I was in for a treat!
The experience:
First off,CT-1 was very user friendly.Installation was simple;the cable is very nice and light.The female RCA fit beautifully unlike any I had found in other cable.It was secure and reliable.It seemed much thought was dedicated to developing a designer fit to an aesthetically stunning RCA connector.Install entailed a few wiggles to ensure what seemed like a compression fit on my RCA.
It was 2-3 hrs. for the 1st step of break in to be complete.At that point I had something different!Today,although they only have 10-12 hrs. on them,I can`t put into words how much my system has transformed.Believe me,I loved my prototypes.However....there is simply no comparision.
The clarity and sound is so natural.
The soundstage is like nothing I ever heard.Resoulution is breathtaking and inner detail is simply hard to believe possible.
The sound has transended and now it simply does not seem as thought I have speakers.
My system is musicians playing music.
I am told with time they will improve and I trust that as it was revealed with the prototypes.I wanted to share my thoughts with you that now.
Unequivocally,a testament to High Fidelity,as the name declares.
High Fidelity Cables for me,the last word on it,after 12 hours!
Truly Amazing

Al
alpass
A question: for isolating a scanning electron microscope, which would be better for purposes of preventing movement of a specimen while it's being photographed -- a coulomb effect device or mass-on-spring device? Answer at 11.
@ Audiopoint, Hi, Thankyou for the post, good educational point about resonance control and isolation, however, all that did not explain how resonance tunning and isolation can change the electrical impedence of a componet or speakers, again, it can not!, the science of resonance is quite different than elecrical, thus have nothing to do with each other.
Did you miss his reply on the 23rd, Audiolabyrinth?
This thread is not the place for such a discussion anyway.
Thanks to all for recent conversations about vibration abatement.
I continue to experiment with vibration Damping and vibration Grounding methods. as always keeping a keen ear on loss of liveness, realness or humanness.
In my current system, with the WGPC (and all other magnetic wave guides )
I like the sound better with some damping directly on the wave guides as it sounds more coherent, resolving, involving.

I like the goosebumps analogy and that (or magic) is what I am always searching for.
Geoffkait, my background is medicine, and during my training, I spent more than four years in research labs. For scanning microscopy and the measurement of structures smaller than a micron, active isolation is typically used. The semiconductor industry also makes use of them where objects can be smaller than 20nm. Slightly different application than audio obviously, but there are some who tout the virtues of active isolation in audio.

Shame on me for further digression. Cable discussion si vous plait....