How do we feel about a B&K ST 1400 for $400

how does this stack up against my intended target NAD 2200 ?

fivefasts02-16-2009 1:57am

mofimadness Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 4,982 posts 02-16-2009 at 06:56am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete IMHO the B&K is a sweeter, warmer sounding amp than the NAD. The NAD will have more dynamic power and probably a bit more bass control. I agree with the above comment...buy the B&K while you can.
narrod Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 1,064 posts 02-16-2009 at 02:07pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Of the two, B&K.
oddiofyl Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 3,793 posts 02-16-2009 at 04:43pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Too much money, I picked up a 2140 last year which is much newer than the 140 for $275.
narrod Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 1,064 posts 02-16-2009 at 10:05pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Oddiofyl, he didn't mention the 140.
mmarvin19 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 157 posts 02-17-2009 at 06:26am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Circa 2003, I had a B&K 2 x 200w (can't recall model #) that had a great sound. But, it died after only 4 weeks. Returned it to the dealer and got a Rotel instead.