Larryi,
First of all I acknowledge that this is something of a matter of taste and also system-matching - as you pointed out, a ripe, bloomy mid-bass *can* be an attraction!
It isn't in the systems I've put together.
EML makes very good tubes but their 300B retains the tube's bass characteristics IME. They may go somewhat lower than most but it is not an tight & controlled, nor as linear in the midbass region, as the 45 - especially the EML 45.
Not sure if you heard an HE version of the AN/E but if not you're talking about 3 dB lower - right about the power difference of SET vs push-pull.
What were the PP 45s you heard?
First of all I acknowledge that this is something of a matter of taste and also system-matching - as you pointed out, a ripe, bloomy mid-bass *can* be an attraction!
It isn't in the systems I've put together.
EML makes very good tubes but their 300B retains the tube's bass characteristics IME. They may go somewhat lower than most but it is not an tight & controlled, nor as linear in the midbass region, as the 45 - especially the EML 45.
Not sure if you heard an HE version of the AN/E but if not you're talking about 3 dB lower - right about the power difference of SET vs push-pull.
What were the PP 45s you heard?