Why are you surprised? As an Audiogon seller I regularly ask potential buyers if they ever bought gear in a Brick & Mortar salon. If they they admit that they have, I tell them that I don't waste my time with high-ballers and hang up.
How are Mullards supposed to sound?
System: Rogers Studio 7, Prima Luna Prologue One, Marantz SA-8003
The stock (Chinese?) tubes in my Prima Luna Prologue One finally wore out after two years. The stock tubes sounded really excellent.
I decided to "upgrade." First to Electro-Harmonix tubes, which sounded decent but not as good as the stock tubes, and now to Mullards.
I know that tubes take a little while to "burn-in" but these Mullards sound awful.
They have a hard, clangy, echoing (microphonic) quality that none of the other tubes ever had. The soundstage seems to have receded backwards by a hundred feet. Everything sounds small and far away.
Is this how Mullards sound? I thought they were supposed to sound romantic. Is this all part of the "burn-in" process?
The stock (Chinese?) tubes in my Prima Luna Prologue One finally wore out after two years. The stock tubes sounded really excellent.
I decided to "upgrade." First to Electro-Harmonix tubes, which sounded decent but not as good as the stock tubes, and now to Mullards.
I know that tubes take a little while to "burn-in" but these Mullards sound awful.
They have a hard, clangy, echoing (microphonic) quality that none of the other tubes ever had. The soundstage seems to have receded backwards by a hundred feet. Everything sounds small and far away.
Is this how Mullards sound? I thought they were supposed to sound romantic. Is this all part of the "burn-in" process?
- ...
- 20 posts total
- 20 posts total