Take a 100wpc amplifier that doubles all the way to .5ohms; That is Dynamic Headroom, at its very Best.While I agree with the general sense of your post, this statement reflects an incorrect definition of "dynamic headroom."
Or another 100wpc amplifier, that produces 140wpc.@4ohms, and maybe 150wpc. @2ohms very briefly. The second amp. does NOT have ANY Dynamic Headroom.
Re-stating what was said earlier in the thread, in slightly different terms, "dynamic headroom" refers to the ratio, usually expressed in db, of an amplifier's short-term maximum power capability to its rated continuous (long-term) maximum power capability.
An amplifier that can double down to 0.5 ohms is designed to be able to supply very large amounts of current. In many cases that kind of amplifier will have very little if any dynamic headroom based on the proper definition, because its maximum output power will typically be limited by the voltage range that its output can encompass.
At the other extreme, quoting Kijanki's accurate restatement of my earlier posts, "within given power supply size (wattage) you could design for higher output voltage (getting better headroom) sacrificing output current and making it weaker for average power demand."
Since the dynamic headroom of an amplifier is based on the proportion of short-term maximum power to long-term maximum power, it will be improved if the design (or the specmanship!) does one of the following:
1)Increases the short-term maximum power, without significantly affecting the long-term maximum power. This basically means increasing the voltage range that the output can swing without clipping.
2)Decreases the long-term maximum power without significantly affecting the short-term maximum power. This is why I mentioned that amplifiers with "weak" power supplies and/or marginal heat dissipation provisions can often have good dynamic headroom numbers.
3)Obviously, some combination of (1) and (2).
Mlsstl & Kijanki -- thank you for your excellent posts.
Regards,
-- Al