I currently own a Bat VK-300se and like the unit very much. I have been toying with moving up the audio chain and would still like to stay with an integrated amp. Other equipment in my system are Meadowlark Blue Herons and for a source I have a Tri vista 21Dac and the Sony 5400ES. In your opinion would the move from Bat to the Luxman be a sideways move or a move up? Other amps I have been considering are the Luxman 590Aii or one or the top end Accuphase integrated units.
Why are you staying with an integrated? Have you considered getting separate BAT pre and BAT amps? Or get a BAT pre and add to another solid state, like Pass or a Luxman? It really depends on whether you want the next evolution, or a whole other type of sound.
If you really have it down to 2 integrated units, can you do a home demo? Even with shipping and a restock fee, it may be worth it.
I actually have been considering separates. At the price point of the 509u or the 590Aii I could get some nice units. I guess the main reason I like integrated units is that the manufacture has complete control to ensure that both the pre and amp stages are optimized to work together. Also get cable clutter and cabling costs.
Eric, The BAT preamp is quiet, natural, dynamic, and refined without the smear, syrup, and truncation of the top or bottom. It puts everything in its proper place.
I think separates could be very satisfying, particularly a BAT pre with your choice of tube or SS amp.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.