2. amps-preamps
  3. 1275138749

McIntosh vs. Marantz ...... sonics?

I have a few 22xx Marantz receivers (2226b and 2250b) which I really enjoy. They sound sweet.
I have heard so many good things about McIntosh that I am intruiged, and maybe interested in trying a Mac. I am thinking of an int-amp or receiver.

Would I really hear an improvement or is it mostly reputation?
I am considering trying it but Mac gear is so much pricier than what I have.

Thanks,
Rob
albireo13
vernneal's avatar
vernneal
438 posts
 
The McIntosh would sound better. Buy used and it will keep 80-100% of its value. It retains the most resale of any brand on amps, preamps and tuners. The recievers you discuss are low fi
albireo13 OP
78 posts
 
Any good recommendations for entry level Mac? int-amp would be great.
elevick
2,637 posts
 
Check out audioclassics.com for ideas. I like a 1500 or 1700 better than the all solid state models.
ryder
1,690 posts
 
Generally receivers sound good with simple music but falter with complex music which requires dynamic swings. From soundstaging, 3-dimensional realism to bass slam, refinement and dynamics, most receivers wouldn't hold a candle to audiophile-grade quality amps if partnering ancillaries and speakers are up to the task.
clsi
2 posts
 
Mcintosh is superior in every way. It sounds far better, the build quality is way better, and I think it looks much cooler.
More to discover