Is there any truth to this question?

I agree that dynamic range is often a problem- and that clipping on transients is more common that we care to admit. In that regard (IMO) it is the clipping character of the amp that often part of the amplifier's reputation.

My speakers are 98 db/1 watt, and I like to have 140 watt amps to drive them. The amps I am using have more nuance than their smaller brothers so I get away with this, as quite often the meters on the amps indicate that they are making far less than even 1 watt. But it is at the same time nice to not be able to come anywhere near clipping the amps regardless of the source or the volume setting. Certain LPs, like the Soria Verdi Requiem, demand this ability!

"it is at the same time nice to not be able to come anywhere near clipping the amps regardless of the source or the volume setting. Certain LPs, like the Soria Verdi Requiem, demand this ability!"

Bingo!

I agree 100%. That's the insurance policy as I like to refer to it.

Atmas, you like 140 tube watts I assume with the 98 db efficient speakers. That would be a nice insurance policy I would think!

02-16-12: Larryi
I cannot think of any speaker that is so inefficient that one would be listening to it at an average output of 30 watts so that a 10 db peak would require 300 watts.

Have you ever made any attempt to measure your power needs objectively or are you guessing? Objectively, 30 watts is not enough power to avoid clipping on music peaks of over 100dB for typical room and speakers though listening levels are not just a function of amplifier power but room reinforcement, room resonances, and room sound absorption all have a significant influence on the power requirements too.

What compromise have you observed with well engineered high powered amplifiers?

In my experience audiophiles under-estimate their power needs.

When I used to sell audio gear back in the 70's, the more powerful amps/receivers in any particular line ALWAYS sounded better on all but perhaps the smallest and most limited speakers. Most lines covered anywhere from 15, 20, 40, 80, 100 120 watts with the various models.

SOme lines sounded better than others at similar power points but a 40 watt amp never trumped a more powerful one with any decent line.

Nothing has changed there in general these days as best I can tell.

I finally answered my own question tonight. I took my 50 w YBA, 100w Krell and 250w Parasound along with a Radio Shack SPL meter and did a comparison. First of all a took the most dynamic cd I own, the soundtrack for "Kansas City" and found that from my listening position I was registering 95 db peaks at the volume I preferred sitting 1.5 m from the speakers in my 10 x 12 room. I'm figuring I'm using 16 watts on the peaks and less than a watt at my normal 80 db volume. I cycled each amp through the system and although I could sense the ease with the Krell and the Parasound I preferred the natural timbre and presentation of the YBA. I realize the YBA was working harder but even so the presentation of the music never changed. The Krell and the Parasound sound like you're shifting gears as you increase the volume. Thanks for all your responses. Doing the swap out was tough from the wheelchair but I guess the only way to decide is to listen for yourself.