Magico S5 vs Tannoy Westminster Royal SE

I don't see how Mbovaird did anything wrong here. It appears to me that the parties objecting to his input are the ones with a real agenda of their own. He never even brought up the other website which you claim he is trying to gain publicity for. The "objectors" were the ones who brought that up once his experience didn't agree with what they may prefer or own. Makes one wonder who really has other motives here, doesn't it? I welcome Mbovaird's input here or elsewhere, and find his comments to be of more value than many other posters here.

Never underestimate the power of denial..

Bill that is the same sense I detect as well, motives questioned because he didn't like the Magico. Seems a bit childish in reality.Why so sensitive regarding the Magico?

Charles, no sensitivity regarding Magico, but I for one get frustrated by members like you who act like self-appointed Defense Barristers without taking the time to know the facts. That would take a lot of time and objectivity, two commodities you clearly lack.

07-30-14: Melbguy1
Charles, no sensitivity regarding Magico, but I for one get frustrated by members like you who act like self-appointed Defense Barristers without taking the time to know the facts. That would take a lot of time and objectivity, two commodities you clearly lack.

I have no dog in this, um, debate. However, at the risk of seeming like a self-appointed defense barrister I will state that IMO, "knowing" Charles not personally but through his many posts over the years, the quoted allegation is simply absurd. And I have no doubt that most long-time A'gon regulars will agree with me.

Also, I would offer the suggestion that when it comes to acting in defense of a given speaker model, ad hominem comments that are vitriolic in tone will tend to come across less than persuasively to those who may be seeking the truth of the matter. Certainly in comparison to the many opinions that were stated in a classy manner earlier in the thread.

Regards,
-- Al