M-Lores or Aon 3: bass/imaging


Ok, yet another thread along the lines of "which speakers should I buy?" (I've read a few thousand of them lately). But my question is really coming from the fact that I've never owned floor-standers before. So I'm sort of paralyzed by the fact that I like the idea of the Tekton Mini-Lores--straight-ahead good design--but I can't audition them. "Money back" -$120 total shipping isn't my idea of money back, on my salary... On the other side of the ring currently are the Golden Ear Aons, which claim the same 38Hz bass response. So, opinions and experiences from people with a deeper background with both kinds of speakers is welcome. If not experience with these models, then experience with the underlying technologies. I'm not sure whether or not conventional wisdom regarding floorstanders vs. bookshelves applies in 2013 with these designs.

Context:
1) I'm running a class-D (solid-state-sounding Icepower) amp, and like it a lot. My listening level is only about 82dB at distance, slow-weighted peaks on an SPL meter. So no need to shake the house. Still, 87dB sensitivity seems a good minimum to be safe. This makes some contenders marginal (Dynaudio, Kef, PSB, Ascend). It suggests Tekton and Golden Ear, in particular, although I'm mainly drawn to both for their bass response spec and other design features.
2) This system will be 2-channel music only. A main goal is to switch the subwoofer off for good, since I've never liked the amount of fiddling I've had to do and haven't ever been entirely comfortable with the result.
3) I'm a sucker for a vast sound stage and good imaging, not too far back (my current Axiom M2v2 speakers put the sound stage someplace way back in the neighbor's house). I also tend to be analytical in most things.
4. Low-E on a bass guitar is about 41Hz, I've read, so this is a good target for the bass freq I'm looking to nail. I want it defined and balanced, not accentuated. But I don't want it just "implied" through harmonics (or else the sub stays on).
5. I've always put on headphones when I want to hear detail, having never owned really top-shelf speakers. I can still do that if I get something really fun from the speakers as a trade off for less detail.

Questions:
1) Reading between the lines, it seems like bass response on floor-standers is reported honestly, while on bookshelves a "38Hz" rating or the like seems really to mean roll off below 60Hz. Is that basically how it goes? E.g., Mini-lores will be flat at 38Hz while Golden Ear Aon 3 would be (to make up a number) like -9dB at 38Hz? The Aons seem to rely on wall reflections to get that bass to you, which might be perfectly fine.
2) Both imaging and air-moving bass are about driver size--or so I've read, and it makes obvious sense. Aon 3 claims 7" mid-range driver; Mini-Lore = 8" wideband driver. Seems pretty close... Comments on either or both of these speakers, based either on personal experience or informed supposition? "They" say the mini-lores are "not the most resolving speaker" etc. Hedge, hedge. Do they stack up to the imaging capabilities of smaller good bookshelves or not?

Note that for the mini-lores, I would need to do vineers and/or grills, so it'll be the same price essentially as the Aon 3s.
That's the pricepoint I'm comfortable with.

I've also auditioned the Sjofn "(The Clue)" speakers, and found them to be terrific as a pro tool, but perhaps actually too detailed and too finicky for a room not furnished around them. I'm still considering them, though. Other than the Clues, I've really never heard outstanding speakers in-depth. I have the Axioms noted above, plus Boston Acoustics A40s from 1986, still in service. That's pretty much my speaker-buying history. I can audition the Golden Ears, but it will be a day trip so won't be doing it lightly. Again, no way to hear the Tektons, but I feel pretty confident about them except for the question mark about possibly lesser imaging (versus the Aons lesser bass?). Thanks in advance for opinions and experiences. I guess this post appears to lean toward the Tektons, but in fact the GEs fit the room better, so I'm still very much open, including being open to not buying anything.
adlevision
Thanks for all the great feedback. And the winner IS::: Both are great speakers! 'Course, I knew that, but I'm very glad to hear more first-hand accounts and it does seem like I would be satisfied bass-wise with either, since my goal is, to put it stupidly, for the bass note to be a solid "dommm" instead of a "hrmmmmm" (subwoofer off) or "blrrrf" (subwoofer on). My current sub is a Klipsch RW-8--inexpensive, but I really resisted investing $$ in a sub. I'll probably go with the Golden Ears because they will fit the room better than the M-Lores and I am sort of a detail freak. I might get the M-Lores later for the larger front room, next time I get the upgrade bug.

Regarding TonyAngel's comment, I agree, and wonder if people may be listening under the influence of conventional wisdom by thinking they need to raise the Mini-Lores. Seems like Eric knows what he is doing and designed them to be floor-standers. I've read that, especially with wide-band drivers, it's not about leveling the tweater, but the sonic center of the speaker, which on the M-Lores would be the 8" wideband driver. But of course it's about individual ears and rooms, and I ain't heard'em.

Good to know that bass freq response figures on floorstanders reflect roll-off the same way the specs on bookshelf speakers do.

I also like this comment and need to think more about it: "Even though a floor stander may be capable of delivering better bass, you may not be able to realize
the benefits of the added bass. This is because putting the speakers where the bass response is best is likely not going to be the position where the
speakers image the best, and placing the speakers where they image the best is unlikely to produce the best bass response."
...this seems to make sense and will have something to do with wall proximity and room size, but I'd have to experiment to figure it out fully. In my specific listening room, the speakers would need to be a maximum of 1 foot from side walls. I wonder if this would be even enough to avoid boominess/boxiness in a small floorstander (it does fine for my small bookshelf speakers, but an inch closer to the wall or too close to the back wall and they become terrible).
I've heard those Goldenears and really liked them a lot, especially for the price. Have not heard Tekton, but a totally different design there. I suspect Aon3 and Class D amp should make a very good pairing!

My only reservation is I am not a ribbon tweeter fan in general and found the high end on the Aon3s a tad to polite for my taste, but that is just me and I think I could live very happily with the Aon3s if I had to. Ribbon tweeter fans looking for bigger sound in a smaller package with room filling soundstage and imaging should absolutely love the Aon3s.
Holley,

I don't know what your space limitations are, or more specifically, what freedom you will have in experimenting with placement.

If you have to shop for speakers without being able to hear them, try to also gather information on how picky they are about placement.

I have some rather extensive limitations that I have to deal with, in terms of speaker placement. My room isn't as long as yours, but it's a good bit wider. I'm filling something around 2800 cubic feet, not including the areas that the room opens into.

I wound up running a pair Silverline Minuet Supreme Pluses, because they are the most forgiving speaker I've found. I actually have them sitting on shelves in an entertainment center. Each shelf is only 18" deep and about 3' wide and the little Minuets still sound good with a good soundstage.

I'm not going to try to tell you that they go low, because they don't, but they aren't finicky at all about placement and they do the bass that they are capable of with authority.

I was just listening to Stevie Ray Vaughn jamming with Albert King and didn't realize for a while that the sub wasn't on. I'm running a little REL T3. It fast and pretty tight and blends well with the Minuets. I have the crossover set at 50hz.
Bigshutterbug`s comments vary vastly from Holley and Mikirob`s impression of the Lore.This could be a classic example of speaker-room acoustic interactions.How else to explain such different results of bass performance.
Regards,

06-21-13: Mapman
I've heard those Goldenears and really liked them a lot, especially for the price. ...

My only reservation is I am not a ribbon tweeter fan in general and found the high end on the Aon3s a tad to polite for my taste, but that is just me and I think I could live very happily with the Aon3s if I had to. Ribbon tweeter fans looking for bigger sound in a smaller package with room filling soundstage and imaging should absolutely love the Aon3s.
The GoldenEar tweeter is not a conventional ribbon tweeter; it's a folded ribbon motion transformer along the lines of the Heil AMT. It's still linear out past 30khz, but is not as "hot" as a conventional ribbon tweeter. I think the reason the GoldenEar tweeter is sometimes characterized as "polite" is because it doesn't have the overshoot and ringing typical of the tweeters we're used to hearing. The Stereophile measurements show that the GoldenEar tweeter is not rolled off at all. When I auditioned the Triton 2's and the Aon 3's, the HF extension was all there, but with no harshness or excessive brightness. I consider this behavior a big plus for the GoldenEars and not a shortcoming.