Fremer's review of the Anna cartridge


Fremer reviews the $8499 cartridge very positively, but it takes three different samples of the cartridge for him to get there. The first sample exhibited "an incompatibility between the adhesives used and the elastomer of which the cartridge's damper is made." Fremer notes "[e]vidently, however, this problem didn't affect every Anna that left the factory." Wow, what a relief. In the second sample, apparently "some the glue that secures the stylus in the cantilever had dripped." The third sample, after 100 hrs of break-in finally delivered. Fremer suggests buying and using an USB microscope as part of the cartridge buying process.

Does anyone else think this is absolutely nuts? It seems to me, at this price level, every single cartridge should be absolutely perfect. Haven't Ortofon heard of quality control? This also applies to Lyra whose $9500 Atlas cartridge had the stylus affixed to the cantilever at an angle that made it virtually impossible to get the SRA of 92 degrees.
actusreus
Thanks for you post Mike. This is the first I have read that that initial run of 8-10 cartridges were "pre-release" samples. Fremer makes no mention of this in the review. The episode had been described to me by a friend overseas as a "recall" of the fist production batch for the US market. Ortofon did take a high road not to discuss this in the Manufacturer's Comments section, but by not doing so, perhaps they became more vulnerable to more questions.

I think the thread has taken the course set out by the original title. I do think that the merits of the MC Anna should be discussed, but perhaps it will take the initiation of a new thread to do so.

I'm interested in hearing this cartridge, but did not go to CES and am not aware of a dealer around the Boston area that has one on demo, so this thread or some other about the cartridge would be most interesting. I would love to read from owners, about how the Anna compares to other cartridges like the Atlas, MSL Gold, AirTight Supreme or XV-1t. Valin does compare it to the Clearaudio.

I don't expect much mention of the Valin review in this thread because of the title of this thread. Both reviews do describe the Anna in pretty high terms and it would be interesting to compare those opinions to others held by owners or those who have heard it in their own systems. It is a relatively heavy cartridge at 16g, and as such would not be as ideal a match for my SME V-12 arm which is ideally suited for a cartridge that weighs 12.5g enabling the counterweight to be as close to the pivot as possible. But I am intrigued by the technology of this and the A90 and think that perhaps Ortofon is leading the way toward a whole new way to construct cartridges. And we all benefit from their pursuit of the next level of performance.

Finally, I don't read this thread as a bashing of the Anna. There have been some pretty critical comments towards Ortofon, but the real focus it seems to me is on Fremer and the choices that he made in writing the review. You comment on precisely this and I think this is what this thread is mostly about. Some have commented on QC in general and in this industry in particular, and that too is a legitimate issue that many of us have experienced.
I have personally owned 2 different era's of Ortofon cartridges and have had q/c problems with each of them. I know others that also had q/c problems with their Ortofons. I will not buy anything Ortofon
I don't understand why Ortofon didn't explain in their Manufacturer's Comments in Stereophile about the bad first batch and that the production problems had been corrected. This thread wouldn't have been necessary.

Did they think that if they didn't say anything that no one would notice that Fremer had to return the first two samples?

A little more honest explanation and less hype and obfuscation would do the high-end a world of good.
I don't understand why Ortofon didn't explain in their Manufacturer's Comments in Stereophile that the first preproduction batch had some problems and that production was stopped and the problems had been corrected before any were shipped for sale to the public. This thread wouldn't have been necessary.

Did they think that if they didn't say anything that no one would notice that Fremer had to return the first two samples?

A little more honest explanation and less hype and obfuscation would do the high-end a world of good.
Dear 'Goners,
Please note that after rereading the above post I felt the first version had some problems that made it unacceptable to be presented to the esteemed readership of this blog.

Those problems have been corrected in the second version and I will give a full refund for whatever you paid to read the first post. Please submit your original receipt (not a copy) with your request.