Thuchan, Yes I read your post of 8-20-13 about the Timeline. I guess I did not understand that the "R 80" is the EMT 927. And your speed management is the stock system as supplied with the 927. I did not understand that or the model designations fully. Sorry. That answers the speed question.
Why will no other turntable beat the EMT 927?
Having owned many good turntables in my audiophile life I am still wondering why not one of the modern designs of the last 20 years is able to beat the sound qualities of an EMT 927.
New designs may offer some advantages like multiple armboards, more than one motor or additional vibration measurements etc. but regarding the sound quality the EMT is unbeatable!
What is the real reason behind this as the machine is nearly 60 years old, including the pre-versions like the R-80?
New designs may offer some advantages like multiple armboards, more than one motor or additional vibration measurements etc. but regarding the sound quality the EMT is unbeatable!
What is the real reason behind this as the machine is nearly 60 years old, including the pre-versions like the R-80?
- ...
- 570 posts total
Dear friends/Dkarmeli: These are the true facts ( not " illusions. ) measurements/specs in the 1957 designed 927: speed unnaccuracy: +,- 0.15%, the swing tell us that the speed unaccuracy in reality is: 0.30% ( the worst I ever seen in any TT. ). wow an flutter: +,- 0.05% with a swing of: 0.1% ( again the worst I ever seen in any TT. ). signal to noise ratio: 58db ( again............. ). as I posted: the 927 was designed for radio stations or recording companies with way different needs that any music lover audiophile has. Gentlemans you can't compete with a very old cycle in a today Formula 1 race. The 927 is a " tour du force " designed not for you or me but for RS or recording manufacturers of those very old times. No one can't change all those facts and I respect that " I like it " but does not means is right and certainly could be that that " I like it " is plain wrong. Regards and enjoy the music, R. |
Dear Tbg: +++++ " if they measure something of value " ++++ normally almost all measurements measure something of value. Measurements normally are not arbitrary but looking " to know something ". Sometimes a measure has no value for us because is not related with what we want to know but even that that measurements has a very specific meaning and value too. ++++ " I would love to see valid measures of this " +++++ me too!!!!, measures that content the drag stylus effect on speed tiny changes and speed recovery at different grooves recorded velocities and at different position trhough the LP recorded " land ". Now, more that see those valid measures what I would like is that the TT designers take in count those measures. I can tell you that seems not and easy task to have the overall measures because maybe different stylus shape and tracking cartridge self abilities could modified those measures. I don't know for sure but could be. I don't know how can affect for that kind of measures changes in the VTF due to LP warps and many other faults that are happening during LP playback. Regards and enjoy the music, R. |
Yes Peter, the R 80 is the preversion of the 927, about 66 units were built so it is said. They all differ a little on small design parts. They usually don't carry a lamp on the left side. The motor management I am using is not the standard 927 one. Mr. Dusch, a former engineer at EMT developed a separate motor management system for the 927. This I am using. Btw he runs his own business and web site now. |
Regards. Found while researching Pioneer P3. Some may find this interesting: http://www.head-fi.org/t/338477/high-end-turntable-showdown Peace. |
- 570 posts total